Skip to content

Conversation

smithamax
Copy link
Member

  • use native fetch
  • better network errors
  • drop support for old load/ipc_manifest
  • typescript everything
  • update build tools

- use native fetch
- better network errors
- drop support for old load/ipc_manifest
- typescript everything
- update build tools
@smithamax smithamax self-assigned this Feb 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@denwilliams denwilliams left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a quick question about loke context

"esModuleInterop": true,
"typeRoots": ["./node_modules/@types", "./types"]
}
"extends": ["@tsconfig/node20/tsconfig"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much nicer

Comment on lines -49 to +46
"@loke/context": "^0.0.1",
"find-up": "^1.1.2",
"got": "^6.3.0",
"node-abort-controller": "^3.0.1",
"node-fetch": "2.6.7",
"p-finally": "^1.0.0"
"@loke/context": "^0.0.1"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, almost 0 deps.
is it worth having @loke/context as a peer dep?
Or it is small enough to not worry.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might need to be a peer dep, but for for now there is only one version so can deal with that when its an issue

Comment on lines -51 to -53
"got": "^6.3.0",
"node-abort-controller": "^3.0.1",
"node-fetch": "2.6.7",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We had got and node-fetch?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the "legacy" client used got, newer one used node-fetch

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah

@smithamax smithamax merged commit 63bb975 into master Feb 20, 2025
4 checks passed
@smithamax smithamax deleted the feature/v5 branch February 20, 2025 04:41
@THEjacob1000 THEjacob1000 mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2025
18 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants